I was wondering how you would manage with the 3d reflection +1 :=)

Thanks...

Trouble is in a way that the reflective planes, thanks to the original design, are bound to be in conflict, as the surfaces are different ?

In a way the TV would look better on its own ??

@spaljeni thank you noticed that this defect. fixed

what would be the effect, I wonder, if the reflection of WEB was entirely removed, leaving just the 3d TV reflection ??

better or worse ? :-)

why in different planes? in one. simply WEB - a flat object, and TEVI - 3d object.

In my understanding mirrors (reflecting surfaces) are always flat.

The reflecting plane under TV as you have made it, is not in the same plane as the reflecting plane of the 2d object.

(they are fine seperately)

but when seen together the eye (my eye at least) has difficulty reconciling the fact that the combined reflective plane of both the 2d and the 3d object is not continuous, ie is not in the same plane.

Possibly this problem is just the inevitable result of mixing 3d and 2d objects in the same image with reflection, (especially when the 3d object is in a less straightforward plane, like yours)
how do you find this one for example ?:

http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs44/f/2009/139/a/3/AVsolutions_3D_Logo_by_Ax...

oh .. I was a little wrong to put it. imagine that this both figures is a one 3D object. like this

Wow...thanks !
Another great drawing....
Illustrates the dilemma most elegantly.. :-)

really hard for the objects for perception because of not quite correct, and unusual forms

Yes exactly... :-)